Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-02 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Black, Gray and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S, with a global score of 80.2 against 76.2. The Google Pixel body is somewhat thinner and extremely lighter than nubia Red Magic 5S, although it was released many years before. Nubia Red Magic 5S has a little bit better looking screen than Google Pixel, because although it has a just a little worse quantity of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a much larger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Nubia Red Magic 5S and Google Pixel count with extremely similar storage capacity to store more games and applications, both of them have the same internal memory capacity. The nubia Red Magic 5S features just a little better performance than Google Pixel, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 2770mAh. Nubia Red Magic 5S has a greater camera than Google Pixel, because it has a much higher 64 MP resolution camera, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a way bigger sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality and a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures in low-light environments.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Google Pixel is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.