Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-02 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S, getting an 80 score against 76.2. Google Pixel 3's body is somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter than nubia Red Magic 5S, even though it was released about 23 months before. Nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a bit worse number of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bigger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a much better memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 54 percent bigger battery size. The nubia Red Magic 5S takes way better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a lot larger camera sensor, a much better video quality and a much better 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Google Pixel 3 not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.