Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-02 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S, having an 82.9 score against 76.2. The Google Pixel 4 XL is an older cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 5S, but it is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a slightly better display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel number in each inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory. Google Pixel 4 XL has a processing unit that's just as good as the nubia Red Magic 5S one, and although the Google Pixel 4 XL has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh. The nubia Red Magic 5S has a much better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality photos and videos, a way more mega-pixels camera and a much better video definition.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Google Pixel 4 XL is also by far the cheapest, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.