Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 385 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 has an overall score of 77.7, which is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 general score. HTC One M9 is a lighter cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 5S, but both of them are 0.38inches thick. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS (Operating System), but HTC One M9 has the older 5.0 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version.
The HTC One M9 features a little more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a much smaller display and a little worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels count per screen inch. HTC One M9 has a little faster processor than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64 bits processor and an extra graphics co-processor.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features a very superior camera than HTC One M9, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a way bigger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a way more mega pixels back facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light images. Nubia Red Magic 5S features a much better memory capacity for applications and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a really longer battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
HTC One M9 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.