Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-09-02 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S, getting an 81 score against 76.2. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the LG G7 ThinQ has a newer 9.0 Pie version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version, so it gives a couple additional features and increased performance. The LG G7 ThinQ design is somewhat thinner and lighter than nubia Red Magic 5S, although it was released 2 years before.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit more powerful processor than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a much better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen density, a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and much more brightness.
Nubia Red Magic 5S shoots much better photographs and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution camera, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
LG G7 ThinQ has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a much better battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the LG G7 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.