Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-02 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Aurora black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S, getting a general score of 82.7 against 76.2. LG G8X ThinQ is an older cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 5S, but LG was able to build it somewhat lighter and thinner anyway. These phones use the same Android 10 OS, so both should provide you the same operating system features.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit better display than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixel amount per inch in the screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a little bit larger screen. LG G8X ThinQ features a processor that's very similar to the nubia Red Magic 5S one, and although the LG G8X ThinQ has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features a very superior camera than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a lot larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a way higher 64 MP resolution back-facing camera and a way better video definition.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. Nubia Red Magic 5S has a little better battery lifetime than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 13% bigger battery capacity.
LG G8X ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.