Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Titan gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 has a general score of 85.4, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's global score of 76.2. The LG K92 body is thinner and a little lighter than nubia Red Magic 5S, even though both were released with only a couple of months difference. These phones include the same Android 10 OS (operating system).
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a slightly better display than LG K92, although it has a quite inferior number of pixels per screen inch and a bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, they both have a display of the same size. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit faster processor than LG K92, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has more RAM.
Nubia Red Magic 5S captures just a bit better videos and photos than LG K92, and although they both have a same resolution back-facing camera and a F1.8 aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a larger sensor capturing higher quality videos and photos and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
LG K92 features a very superior memory to store more apps and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG K92 also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The nubia Red Magic 5S has just a little better battery lifetime than LG K92, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG K92 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.