Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Mineral Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge (2022) has a global score of 84.7, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's global score of 76.2. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS, but the Motorola Edge (2022) has a newer 12 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10. Motorola Edge (2022)'s design is newer, thinner and extremely lighter than the nubia Red Magic 5S.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a just a bit lower pixels count in each inch in the display, it also counts with a bit larger display. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit faster processor than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a greater amount of RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 5S shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have the same aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a back-facing camera with a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution. Motorola Edge (2022)'s storage for games and applications is very similar to nubia Red Magic 5S's one, both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge (2022) features just a bit better battery duration than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, Motorola Edge (2022) is also cheaper than the other phone, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.