Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a global score of 77, which is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's general score of 76.2. Motorola Edge 40 Neo is a extremely newer cellphone, and it is also somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter than nubia Red Magic 5S. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 40 Neo has newer 13 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version, so it provides some additional features.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a way better performance than Motorola Edge 40 Neo. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 8 GB RAM. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a slightly better screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way brighter screen, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little greater display pixel density.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo has as much memory capacity for games and applications as the nubia Red Magic 5S one, both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. The nubia Red Magic 5S has a little bit better camera than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing worse quality pictures and videos, and they both have the same aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a back facing camera with way more megapixels and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a bit better battery performance than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.