Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has an overall score of 81.9, which is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 overall score. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a more recent 14 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version, so it provides you lots of additional features. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo construction is way newer, much lighter and somewhat thinner than the nubia Red Magic 5S.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a way better display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with much more brightness, a just a bit better pixels number per inch of display and a slightly higher resolution of 1256 x 2760 pixels. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. They have 8 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit longer battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The nubia Red Magic 5S shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor giving a worse image quality, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a much more MP back camera and a much better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.