Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-02 | -- |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | -- |
| 7.76 ounces | -- |
| Sonic silver | Interstellar Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has an overall score of 78.9, which is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's score of 76.2. Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024)'s construction is way lighter and notably thinner than the nubia Red Magic 5S. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has newer 14 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version, so it gives you some nice extra features and enhanced performance.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), although it has less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Nubia Red Magic 5S has a sharper display than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), although it has a quite worse display density and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, they both have a same size screen.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has slower 15 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video quality, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a lot more MP camera. Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 128 GB more internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) features a bit better battery lifetime than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.