Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a score of 86.3, which is much better than nubia Red Magic 5S's general score of 76.2. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has 14 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version, giving a lot of extra features. Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a a lot newer cellphone, and it is also lighter and thinner than nubia Red Magic 5S.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a bit sharper screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little better display density and way more brightness.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 512 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro's battery life is just as good as the battery duration in nubia Red Magic 5S. Nubia Red Magic 5S takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a lot tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and videos and a smaller back-facing camera sensor which provides a worse photo and video quality, it also counts with a way higher video resolution and a camera in the back with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.