Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Smoke black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 5S is a bit better than Moto G Power, having a 76.2 score against 76.1. Both devices in this comparison use Android operating system, but nubia Red Magic 5S has an older 10 version while Moto G Power has Android 11. The nubia Red Magic 5S is a just a little bit heavier phone than Moto G Power, but both of them have the same thickness.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit more powerful processor than Moto G Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has more RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a bit inferior number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bigger display.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a greater camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light images, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a much larger sensor and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution. Moto G Power counts with a greater memory to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Moto G Power features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has an 11% greater battery capacity.
Although nubia Red Magic 5S is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G Power. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola Moto G Power, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.