Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a score of 86.2, which is better than nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 general score. The Motorola Moto G200 5G is a newer phone, and it is also a bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than the nubia Red Magic 5S. Both devices in this comparison review use Android operating system, but Motorola Moto G200 5G has a more recent 11 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10, so it counts with lots of additional features.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a slightly better looking screen than Moto G200 5G, although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a quite worse number of pixels per inch in the screen and a quite smaller display. The Motorola Moto G200 5G's memory capacity for apps and games is very similar to nubia Red Magic 5S's one, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage.
The Moto G200 5G features a bit better processor than nubia Red Magic 5S. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount. The nubia Red Magic 5S takes clearer photos and videos than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a camera in the back with a way lower 64 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and a lot higher video definition.
The Moto G200 5G features a bit better battery lifetime than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has an 11% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.