Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2020-08-28 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Forest green and Sapphire blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G9 Play has an overall score of 76.7, which is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 global score. These devices have the same Android 10 OS. Moto G9 Play is a just a little lighter and just a bit thinner cellphone than nubia Red Magic 5S, even when both of them were only released 0 months apart.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a bit better CPU than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a brighter screen than Moto G9 Play, because it has more pixels per inch in the screen, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit larger screen.
Moto G9 Play features a bigger storage to store more apps and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Moto G9 Play features just a bit longer battery lifetime than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has an 11% bigger battery size.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit better camera than Moto G9 Play, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same sensor size, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a way more megapixels camera and a way higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.