Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-09-02 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 5S has an overall score of 76.2, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Force's score of 75.8. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but nubia Red Magic 5S has an older 10 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. The nubia Red Magic 5S is a a lot newer cellphone than the Motorola Moto Z Force, but it's a lot thicker and way heavier.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a greater number of cores (and also faster) and more RAM memory. Moto Z Force features a bit more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Moto Z Force features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with greater battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a 29 percent larger battery capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 5S captures a lot better photos and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a lot higher video resolution.
Although nubia Red Magic 5S is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto Z Force. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Moto Z Force, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.