Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-09-02 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Sonic silver | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z3 has a general score of 77.6, which is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's score of 76.2. The Moto Z3 is an a lot older phone than the nubia Red Magic 5S, but it's much lighter and noticeably thinner anyway. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto Z3 has a newer 9.0 Pie version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version, so it offers some nice extra features.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a bit sharper display than Moto Z3, because although it has a just a little lower number of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px. Nubia Red Magic 5S features just a little better processing power than Moto Z3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has more RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 5S captures greater photos and videos than Moto Z3, because it has a camera with way more mega-pixels, a much better video quality, a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger diafragm aperture. Moto Z3 has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a much longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Motorola Moto Z3 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.