Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-02 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Sonic silver | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z3 Play is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S, with a overall score of 76.3 against 76.2. Despite of the fact that Motorola Moto Z3 Play is way older than nubia Red Magic 5S, it's construction is much thinner and noticeably lighter. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has 4 GB more RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little bit better display than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a quite worse pixel number per display inch, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bit larger display. The Moto Z3 Play features much more storage to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a very superior camera than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot better video quality, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor and a camera with a lot better 64 mega-pixels resolution. Nubia Red Magic 5S features a much longer battery lifetime than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Moto Z3 Play is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest, which makes this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.