Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-02 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Oxford blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G is better than the nubia Red Magic 5S, getting an 84.6 score against 76.2. Even when the Motorola One 5G and the nubia Red Magic 5S were only released with a few months difference, the Motorola One 5G is a bit lighter and just a little thinner. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit faster processor than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a higher amount of RAM.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a little bit better looking display than Motorola One 5G, although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit less pixels per inch of display, they both have a display with the same size. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit better camera than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light captures, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a back-facing camera with a way better 64 MP resolution and a bigger sensor which offers a better image and video quality.
The Motorola One 5G features a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola One 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola One 5G counts with a bit superior battery life than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has an 11 percent more battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Motorola One 5G is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.