Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has a global score of 79.8, which is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 general score. Motorola One Hyper's design is just a bit thinner and just a little lighter than the nubia Red Magic 5S, although it was released about 9 months before. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola One Hyper has the newer 11 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10, so it counts with some additional features.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a little bit better processing power than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit inferior number of pixels per screen inch, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a little larger screen.
The nubia Red Magic 5S shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a camera with a 64 megapixels, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a bigger aperture to take better images in low light situations and a way higher video quality. Motorola One Hyper has a lot bigger storage for apps and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit superior battery lifetime than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 13 percent larger battery size.
Motorola One Hyper not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.