Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-02 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom has a global score of 80, which is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's global score of 76.2. Motorola One Zoom's design is lighter and just a little bit thinner than nubia Red Magic 5S, although it was released just a bit further than a year before. The nubia Red Magic 5S has a bit superior processing unit than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a slightly better screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a just a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a little bit bigger screen. The nubia Red Magic 5S shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and video, it also counts with a larger camera sensor capturing better quality pictures and videos, a lot better 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Motorola One Zoom features a superior storage for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Zoom also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 128 GB. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with just a bit longer battery life than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, the Motorola One Zoom is also by far the cheapest one, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.