Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is better than the nubia Red Magic 5S, getting an 87 score against 76.2. The Motorola razr (2020) is a thinner and lighter cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 5S, although they were released only 1 months apart. Both devices in this review use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola razr (2020) has 11 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10, giving a lot of extra features.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit superior processor than Motorola razr (2020). They have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. The nubia Red Magic 5S features a little more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a quite larger display, a quite higher display pixel density and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Nubia Red Magic 5S has just a bit better camera than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs or videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a camera in the back with way more MP, a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 61 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the nubia Red Magic 5S, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as nubia Red Magic 5S. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Motorola razr (2020), else you can save a couple dollars and get the nubia Red Magic 5S, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.