Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2023-12-16 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S, having a 77.4 score against 76.2. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G is a a lot newer device, and it is also thinner and just a little bit lighter than nubia Red Magic 5S. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a more recent 14 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10, giving you some additional features.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a much faster processing unit than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy A15 5G counts with a little bit better screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a brighter screen and a bit greater quantity of pixels in each inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Nubia Red Magic 5S has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have the same aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a way higher video resolution and a back camera with a much higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G counts with just a bit longer battery life than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Galaxy A15 5G not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.