Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 5S has an overall score of 76.2, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A22's 76.1 global score. Even being the best in this comparison, we must tell that it is also older, somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but nubia Red Magic 5S has the previous 10 version while Galaxy A22 has Android 12 version.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy A22, because it has a better pixels count per inch of screen, a much better 1080 x 2340px resolution and a bit bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy A22 has a much better storage capacity for apps and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has more RAM. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a much higher video resolution and a much higher 64 MP resolution camera.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a much better battery duration than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.