Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is much better than nubia Red Magic 5S, getting a global score of 84.6 against 76.2. These phones have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has newer 11 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G body is newer, a bit lighter and a little bit thinner than the nubia Red Magic 5S.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 5S has a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a bit lower pixel number in each inch in the screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a bit larger screen.
The nubia Red Magic 5S takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a camera in the back with a lot better resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a little better battery life than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.