Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G has a general score of 79.9, which is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's score of 76.2. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A25 5G has 14 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version, so it counts with a lot of extra features and performance tweaks. The Galaxy A25 5G is a notably newer cellphone, and it is also somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than nubia Red Magic 5S.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a little sharper display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a just a little higher pixel quantity in each screen inch and a way brighter display.
Galaxy A25 5G features a very superior storage to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1 TB. The nubia Red Magic 5S features a really superior performance than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A25 5G has just a little bit longer battery performance than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh. Nubia Red Magic 5S captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a much larger back camera sensor, a way higher video resolution and a camera with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.