Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-02 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A30 is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S, getting a general score of 79.6 against 76.2. Galaxy A30 is an older phone than the nubia Red Magic 5S, but it is a lot lighter and a lot thinner anyway. Nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a little lower pixel count in each display inch, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a bit larger screen. Nubia Red Magic 5S shoots a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a back facing camera with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy A30 counts with a bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. Nubia Red Magic 5S features just a bit better battery life than Galaxy A30, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.