Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-02 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S's score of 76.2. Even though the Galaxy A50 is older than the nubia Red Magic 5S, it's construction is way thinner and lighter. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has more RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a little bit better display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a little bit lower pixel density, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340px resolution, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a little bit bigger screen. Nubia Red Magic 5S features a greater camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures or videos in low light situations, it also counts with a back facing camera with much more megapixels, a way larger camera sensor shooting lot better quality pictures and a much better video resolution.
Galaxy A50 has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A50 also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The Galaxy A50 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.