Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-02 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is much better than the nubia Red Magic 5S, with an 86.6 score against 76.2. Both of these devices include the same Android 10 OS (Operating System). The Galaxy A50s is an older cellphone than nubia Red Magic 5S, but Samsung was able to build it extremely thinner and a lot lighter. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a bit better screen than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a quite worse count of pixels per inch of display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a little bigger screen. Nubia Red Magic 5S shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution, a lot more megapixels back facing camera, a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos in low light situations and a bigger sensor taking better quality videos and photographs.
The Galaxy A50s counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A50s also has a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The nubia Red Magic 5S has a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.