Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Prism cube black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has a score of 90.8, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 overall score. The Galaxy A51 5G design is lighter and thinner than the nubia Red Magic 5S, even though they were released with only 4 months difference. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A51 5G has 11 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10, so it provides you some additional features and optimized performance.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 5S has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little lower pixels count in each inch of screen, it also counts with a quite larger display.
Nubia Red Magic 5S captures clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a larger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality photographs and videos, a camera with way more MP, a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a larger camera aperture to take better images in low light environments.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A51 5G also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A51 5G's battery lifetime is just as good as the nubia Red Magic 5S one.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy A51 5G is also a bargain compared to others, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.