Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-02 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Sonic silver | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is better than the nubia Red Magic 5S, getting a overall score of 90.7 against 76.2. Even though Samsung Galaxy A52 and the nubia Red Magic 5S were only released 7 months apart, Samsung Galaxy A52 is somewhat lighter and thinner. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little better performance than Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a higher amount of RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit larger display. The nubia Red Magic 5S captures just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, a 0.59 inches sensor and the same resolution back facing camera, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a way higher video resolution.
Galaxy A52 features a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A52 also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 and nubia Red Magic 5S both have really similar batteries duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.