Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Sonic silver | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is better than nubia Red Magic 5S's global score of 76.2. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A52 5G has newer 12 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10. The Galaxy A52 5G is a lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than nubia Red Magic 5S, even when both of them were only released with a couple of months difference.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a just a little worse display density and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit larger screen. Nubia Red Magic 5S has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has more RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 5S captures clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same resolution camera in the back, the same camera sensor size and a F1.8 camera aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a much higher video definition. Galaxy A52 5G features a way bigger storage to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 5G's battery performance is very similar to nubia Red Magic 5S's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.