Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-02 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a score of 76.2, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017)'s 75.8 overall score. The nubia Red Magic 5S design is extremely newer than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017)'s, although it's thicker and heavier. The nubia Red Magic 5S has just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a just a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a larger screen.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a greater memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has more RAM.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with greater battery life than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 4500mAh battery size. Nubia Red Magic 5S captures much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a lot higher video resolution, a lot more MP back-facing camera and a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.