Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-02 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A70 has a general score of 76.9, which is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 5S's overall score of 76.2. Although the Samsung Galaxy A70 is older than nubia Red Magic 5S, it's body is somewhat thinner and lighter. Both of these phones include the same Android 10 OS (Operating System).
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has more RAM. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit lower pixels density, they both have a screen with the same size.
The Galaxy A70 features a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A70 also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing photos or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a much higher video definition and a way bigger sensor providing a way better image quality.
Galaxy A70 has a battery duration that is just as good as nubia Red Magic 5S's battery performance.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A70 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.