Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 is much better than nubia Red Magic 5S, having a general score of 87.5 against 76.2. The Galaxy A71 body is way thinner and lighter than nubia Red Magic 5S, even when both of them were released with only a few months difference. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A71 has 11 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10, so it provides lots of additional features.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy A71, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has more RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 5S has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A71, although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit lower number of pixels per display inch, they both have a screen with the same size.
Nubia Red Magic 5S captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A71, and although they both have a 0.59 inches sensor, a 64 megapixels camera and a F1.8 aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition. Galaxy A71 counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A71 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Nubia Red Magic 5S and Galaxy A71 feature very similar batteries duration.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy A71 is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.