Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-09-02 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C7 has a score of 77.7, which is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's score of 76.2. Galaxy C7's construction is noticeably thinner and notably lighter than the nubia Red Magic 5S, although it was released many years before. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy C7 has 8.0 Oreo version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features a little sharper display than Galaxy C7, because although it has a just a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a larger screen. The nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy C7, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a larger amount of RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy C7, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The nubia Red Magic 5S has superior battery life than Galaxy C7, because it has a 36 percent bigger battery size.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution, a much better video definition and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.