Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is much better than nubia Red Magic 5S, having a global score of 88.1 against 76.2. Samsung Galaxy F62 is a just a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner cellphone than nubia Red Magic 5S, even when both were only released 6 months apart. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy F62 has the newer 11 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10, counting with some additional features and enhanced performance.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit better processing power than Galaxy F62, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and more CPU cores. The nubia Red Magic 5S features a little sharper display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a just a little lower number of pixels per inch of display and a little worse 1080 x 2340px resolution, and they both have a screen of the same size, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a brighter screen.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the same sensor size and the same aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a much better video resolution. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a way better battery duration than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.