Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-02 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is a lot better than nubia Red Magic 5S, having a score of 97.6 against 76.2. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10. Galaxy Fold's body is much thinner than the nubia Red Magic 5S, but it's extremely heavier and was released only 11 months before.
Galaxy Fold features a little better performance than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel density.
The nubia Red Magic 5S captures a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a much better resolution back camera, a much bigger back camera sensor shooting much better quality photos and a way better video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a very superior memory for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 384 GB more internal storage capacity. Nubia Red Magic 5S has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 3 percent greater battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot more expensive than nubia Red Magic 5S, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.