Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 global score. The Galaxy Note 3 is an noticeably older device than the nubia Red Magic 5S, but it is thinner and lighter anyway. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 3 has the previous 5.0 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a bit more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a just a little better pixel count per screen inch. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 5S shoots a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a lot bigger sensor, a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution, a bigger aperture for better low light photography and a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a slightly better memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 41 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 3 is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.