Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note3 has a global score of 77.7, which is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S's general score of 76.2. These devices include Android operating system, but Galaxy Note3 has newer 4.4.2 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10, so it provides the user a lot of extra features and performance optimizations. The Galaxy Note3 body is a lot lighter and somewhat thinner than nubia Red Magic 5S, even though it was released many years before.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and also faster). The nubia Red Magic 5S features a little bit better display than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a bit worse count of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a larger screen.
The nubia Red Magic 5S takes greater pictures and videos than Galaxy Note3, because it has a bigger aperture for better low light images, a way larger sensor providing a much higher image quality, a much better video quality and a camera with lot more mega-pixels. The nubia Red Magic 5S features a slightly bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.