Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2020-09-02 | 2018-01-09 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Sonic silver | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 385 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy On7 Prime is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S, with a 76.9 score against 76.2. Galaxy On7 Prime's design is thinner and a lot lighter than nubia Red Magic 5S, even though it was released many years before. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy On7 Prime has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10, so it provides some nice extra features and performance tweaks.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a bit inferior number of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bigger screen. Nubia Red Magic 5S features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a very superior camera than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a larger aperture for better low-light photos and videos, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a way larger camera sensor shooting way higher quality photos and a camera with a way better 64 mega pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime has just a bit more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 256 GB. The nubia Red Magic 5S has longer battery lifetime than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a 36% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.