Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-02 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 is better than the nubia Red Magic 5S, with an 88.3 score against 76.2. These phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has the newer 11 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10, so it gives you a couple additional features and performance optimizations. Samsung Galaxy S10 is an older phone than nubia Red Magic 5S, but Samsung was able to build it notably lighter and somewhat thinner.
The Galaxy S10 has a bit more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3040 resolution and a higher pixels quantity in each inch in the screen. Nubia Red Magic 5S and Samsung Galaxy S10 have really similar processors, both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S10 counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy S10 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB. Nubia Red Magic 5S captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S10, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures, a camera in the back with much more megapixels and a much better video resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.