Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-02 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a score of 93.6, which is a lot better than nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 global score. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G construction is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the nubia Red Magic 5S, even though it was released about a year before. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has newer 11 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version, so it provides the user a couple additional features and performance optimizations.
Galaxy S10 5G counts with a slightly better display than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have a same size display, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a better pixel density. The Galaxy S10 5G has much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S10 5G's processing unit is very similar to nubia Red Magic 5S's CPU, both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a battery performance that's very similar to the nubia Red Magic 5S one. Nubia Red Magic 5S shoots way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot larger sensor taking much higher quality photographs, a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a back camera with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.