Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-02 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is much better than nubia Red Magic 5S, with an 86.3 score against 76.2. Despite of the fact that Galaxy S10e is older than nubia Red Magic 5S, it's construction is thinner and notably lighter. The nubia Red Magic 5S features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a little bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a larger display.
Samsung Galaxy S10e and nubia Red Magic 5S both have very similar processing units, and although the Samsung Galaxy S10e has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Galaxy S10e counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S10e also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Nubia Red Magic 5S shoots a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor, a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a way more mega-pixels back camera. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy S10e is also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.