Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 is way better than nubia Red Magic 5S, with a 94.8 score against 76.2. Even when Galaxy S20 and the nubia Red Magic 5S were released only 6 months apart, Galaxy S20 is thinner and a lot lighter. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Galaxy S20 has 13 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version, so it gives you some extra features.
The Galaxy S20 counts with a bit superior processor than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy S20 counts with a bit more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3200 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy S20 counts with much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S20 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The nubia Red Magic 5S has a better camera than Galaxy S20, because although it has worse 15 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a 0.59 inches sensor, the same video resolution and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 costs a lot more money than the nubia Red Magic 5S, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.