Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 has a global score of 93.4, which is way better than nubia Red Magic 5S's score of 76.2. These phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 has 13 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10, providing a couple additional features. The Galaxy S22 construction is newer, much lighter and notably thinner than the nubia Red Magic 5S.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S22. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and a 8 GB RAM. Galaxy S22 has a much better display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a lot brighter screen and a just a bit more pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy S22 captures a bit better photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a worse video resolution and a back facing camera with lot less mega-pixels resolution, and they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy S22's memory capacity for applications and games is just as good as the nubia Red Magic 5S one, both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 5S has longer battery life than Galaxy S22, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S22 costs more money than nubia Red Magic 5S, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.