Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the nubia Red Magic 5S, getting a global score of 95.4 against 76.2. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's construction is newer and a little thinner than the nubia Red Magic 5S's, although it's just a bit heavier.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has a quite bigger display, a way brighter display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a better pixel density.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a better camera than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much larger sensor taking much better quality videos and photos, a lot more megapixels camera and faster 24 fps video frame rate.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features as much memory capacity to store more games and applications as the nubia Red Magic 5S, both have the same internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features just a little better battery duration than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Galaxy S22 Ultra costs a lot more than the nubia Red Magic 5S, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.