Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-02 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S, having a score of 79.5 against 76.2. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy S7 is incredibly older than the nubia Red Magic 5S, it's construction is thinner and lighter. The Galaxy S7 counts with a more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per inch of display, more display brightness and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. Nubia Red Magic 5S has a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a greater number of cores (and they are faster).
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a lot bigger back camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and pictures and a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a way better battery performance than Galaxy S7, because it has a 50% more battery capacity.
The Galaxy S7 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.