Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-02 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S, having an 83.3 score against 76.2. Galaxy S9's design is lighter and thinner than nubia Red Magic 5S, although it was released many years before. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy S9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S9 counts with a bit sharper display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels quantity per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960. Nubia Red Magic 5S shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a much larger camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photos and a back-facing camera with a way better 64 MP resolution.
The Galaxy S9 has a quite bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 400 GB. Nubia Red Magic 5S has a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy S9 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.