Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-09-02 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 385 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 5S, getting a score of 80.1 against 76.2. Despite being the best cellphone we are comparing, it must be told that it's also a somewhat heavier and notably thicker cellphone. These devices have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version, so it offers a couple additional features.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little bit better display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much higher resolution camera in the back and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
The nubia Red Magic 5S and the Galaxy XCover FieldPro both have similar batteries duration.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than nubia Red Magic 5S, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the nubia Red Magic 5S. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the nubia Red Magic 5S, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.